United States v. Roetcisoender

Defendant appealed his conviction for two counts of distribution of child pornography and one count of possession of child pornography. The court concluded that the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction for distribution. Further, the court concluded that the district court did err by applying a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. 2G2.2(b)(6) because the offense involved the use of a computer and U.S.S.G. 2G2.2(b)(3)(F) because the offense involved distribution other than distribution described in the other subsections of section 2G2.2(b)(3). Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment. View "United States v. Roetcisoender" on Justia Law