Test Masters Educ. Svc. v. State Farm Lloyds

TES filed suit against State Farm, seeking a declaratory judgment that State Farm owes TES a duty to defend in an underlying lawsuit with Robin Singh Education Services involving test preparation services. The court concluded that the factual allegations in Singh’s Amended Counterclaim do not potentially include a trade dress infringement claim. Instead, the Amended Counterclaim alleges trademark infringement and false advertising claims. Neither of those claims is covered under the policy. Therefore, the district court was correct to grant summary judgment in favor of State Farm and the court affirmed the judgment. View "Test Masters Educ. Svc. v. State Farm Lloyds" on Justia Law